92% of readers want male/female observations and analysis. That's broad: mocking flip flops, dating culture trends, girl behavior meanings. I'll address analysis lovers here. Like many guys, I have analytical mind. Breaking things into parts helps understanding fully. But you don't tear radios apart to use them. You don't need understanding women to date them. They're too complicated and variable for analysis to matter for marriage or casual success.

Think differently. Stop: "I want learning about them to date better." Start: "I'll try different things until finding what works." See the difference? One depends on understanding, other on effort. One leads mental masturbation, other to unprotected sex and results. I gauge woman's response but don't consciously determine why. Who cares why? I said something wrong, girl cried. Not sure why. Didn't change anything. Everything fine. That's the approach for marriage and casual.

I told girl I liked her first date after she said same. Had rough sex. Did I do wrong? Nope. Got what wanted. Grand. Don't care why opener fails or face-cum comment offends. Next time different opener, different delivery. Keep trying strategies until experience proves something works. Raw data from attempts beats rabbit hole understanding. Trying understand woman takes you down mud road with little fruit. You might hate women after, wondering why effort invested.

Patterns emerge and I note them for sharing, mostly for fun. You don't need understanding women for getting laid. Need knowing what they like from your personality, background, look. That comes entirely from experience and testing. Actually, girls like when you don't care understanding them. You're aloof, difficult, wrapped in magical world of masculinity and pensiveness. That's attractive. For marriage prospects, this aloofness maintains mystery and intrigue.